Glibly stated, the US does very odd things in social settings to try and limit any social interaction in the US (the goal is complete isolation).

You could also use the internet postings to show that scale of social malice in the US, its massive. But what did the US do in interpersonal settings in the US to limit forming any friends networks or social relationships?

Its simple, I didn't know any people when I moved to New York City in 2014 when I was 29 and then San Diego in 2017.

Literally in all social settings the US replaced all people my age in meetup groups that I signed up for with people far older than me. So if I was 29, the people in the groups would always be greater than 50 and that's in whatever group I signed up for.

This is in my 2014 walking group in NYC. All people before the statue are in my meetup group:

This is in my 2017 meetup group in San Diego.

Notice how everyone in the group is older than 50 years old except maybe 2 people? Thats intentional by the US to limit social interaction with those in my age group (the US tried this in England as well, its a predictable behavior of the US).

It was a weird and an odd type of malice.

Well ofcourse a person in their 20s couldn't really find much commonality with people in their 50s, so that became US's way of limiting social interaction.

But this agenda was predefined by US's internet behavior, if you couldn't digitally isolate a person using facebook you could do it through an age gap to limit the formation of appropriate relationships with people my age or people with my relatively younger mentality of any age.

It's a divide between psychology and intentional social isolation in the US.

You could pick out the agenda by looking at this meetup list from 2017:

Its easy to pick out the malice in US social settings.

In this case the US canceled two large groups (the International Friends and Tall Sandiegans Groups) so only people in a older age bracket would be at a social event (the Liquid Blue event). Videoed below:

Notice how the band is directed towards younger people but the audiance is greater than 50:

It was an odd if not mentally ill form of social malice.

This is in additional to limiting any and all digital forms of communication on facebook and other digital social networks with the explicit reason to completely isolate me.

The US, generally speaking, does weird, oddball, and predictable things to perpetuate malice in different ways.

Those Who Perpetuate Social Malice

A realization in those who perpetuate social malice is that they are either intellectually impoverished (have a limited intellect) or suffer from social economic disparity and are desperate for some sort of personal gain.

The united states in desperation often cites a person with a prefix of Ca in her name to perpetuate social malice. I only met the person in the latter part of 2017 in a Mexico City, where there is a far greater level of socioeconomic disparity than in the US and Europe. The social malice in the US had already spanned for more than a decade before with clear evidence. You could guess that this continued pattern was due to US's predefined attempts at social malice, most of which as described above was oddball behavior by the country (you could typify the country as odd in their attempts). Every single conversation with this particular female was saved in full audio recording, the file listing is given below:

The First is Given Below:

Literally every single word made to her is saved in a recording. There weren't many conversations. There are fairly light conversations about non important topics as we walked through the city center in Mexico City. Sometimes we talked about medical technologies as well but its all saved in full. Lighthearted and unimportant topics.

The locals in mexico informed me that she was a "gold digger". And that she was done "adulting" (or doing things with adult responsiblity).

Then her behavior became erratic with no reason (recorded) and then she repeatedly missed appointments with me and I finally had to block her on facebook when she missed my birthday appointment. Her behavior had been erratic (with evidence) for a while before then. I never understood why but I believe its because of the US's direction in long standing social malice.

The recording with her are important because it shows criminal intent in social malice, where I am perfectly normal in all conversations with her with no consequence with her but the US citing her in furthering malice is baseless and nonsensical.

She chooses to act in malice due to her socio economic disparity and the US's desperation in perpetuating social malice and that's the clear and well defined reason. Personal gain due to socio economic impoverishment in the likely and predictable reason (poor people effecting relatively richer people).

In reality shes simply a random person who I had a few completely inconsequential conversations with. Easy to present as such with recordings.

Video Explanation of Social Networking and Internet Malice Topics