Narendra Nirmal Jana

Email: narenjana@narenjana.com

Email: narenj5@protonmail.com

December 3rd 2020 Asylum Interview:

Home Office Reference #: J1989785

Application ASC #: ASC/5271126

Back to Main Page

*Post Interview Substantiative Documents Section

*Substantiative Documents Post Interview

Medical Documents Section

Medical Documents Section

Medical Doctors Causing Harm is Clinical Settings Section

Medical Doctors Causing Harm is Clinical Settings Section

*The Bigger Case Not Fully Presented

The Bigger Case

The Presentation Made So Far is a Superficial Presentation and Largely Only Acknowledges the Cause of Immediate Physical Harm

Though it may be hard to believe given the length of the presentation this is only the superficial presentation of the overall case.

The reason why the entire case wasn't presented is because the most important topics is the immediate cause of physical harm that I must be removed from:

Harm through medical negligence and repeated instances of assault and malice in medical setting with the intent of physical or intellectual disfigurement.

This overall case is complex and many topics weren't covered intentionally. Most of what was done to me outside of the topics presented here were criminal in nature and comes with easy evidence to the nature of their criminality. It was criminality to try and harm me.

In order to present the other topics I would need a legal intermediary (a solicitor) between the United States and I to present the topics while the US presents their defense for each topic.

It could be assumed that I have clear evidence of the topics given below that I could not present until I had an legal intermediary between the US and I where they would have to present their case.

Due to the explicitness of the evidence of illegality in the US and by the US, it would be an easy legal case against the US.

To Intel

To Intel

First lets define explicit and implicit statements:

Lets Defining Explicit and Implicit Statements

The other topics:

1. The Primary Suspects and Evidence of Where it Originated From-Clear and gross evidence of the length and time period that the US perpetuated this type of malice, their persistent intent was well defined since when I was in university with clear evidence.

The Primary Suspects and Evidence of Where it Originated From

2. A Governmental Malice

A Governmental Malice

3. General police harrasment in the US and outside the US as directed by the US.

General Police harrasment in the US and Outside the US as Directed by the US

4. US trying to corrupt digital diagnostic files that indicate medical falsification by the US in foreign nations.

Technology Companies Corrupting Digital Data and Diagnostic Files to Protect Doctors Commiting Clinical Fraud to Harm

5. US using digital methods of file deletion or file corruption to try and hide evidence of malice and harm in and outside of the US, this includes attempts at preventing the accumulation of referential medical textbook data that shows their medical falsification with clear detail.

6. US using media and social networking to effect me negatively depending on the effects of the clinical condition. There is often a violent instigation of my condition using media and social networking, all well recorded and easy to present.

How Do I Prove Malice by US Tech/Internet Companies?-I Saved all of my Internet Data

A small portion of this case is presented here:

US Directed Internet Malice on Google, Facebook, other Search Engines, and Internet Media in General

Internet Bullying and Malice-Birthday

Using the Effects from Seizures to Perpetuate Malice (Indicated on Facebook)

The General US Public Knew I was Having Seizures due to Intentional Medical Mistreatment

Facebook

Making Sense of Ameritrade Relative to other Internet Tech Companies

US Breaks Data Privacy Laws to Access Personal Data

7. US using search engines to advertise topics that I am not interested in (often lewd or illegal topics) to me when searching unrelated topics. A form of digital malice and digital targeting.

Google Advertising Illegal Content to me as a Targeted Audiance by the US

Google Trying to Cover up Evidence of Internet Malice

Its Most Likely a Government Entity (US Armed Forces) that's Posting Illegal Web Content and Leading the Overall Malice (it was stated to be "Militarized")

The Public Statement of Lawless Should Now Make Sense

8. US advertising things in digital media to instigate my clinical condition knowingly according to the effects of the clinical condition.

9. Using the effects of the clinical condition specifically for the sake of sexual discrimination and malice in a false and unsubstantiated guise.

The US Forcing Sexual Incongruity through Intentional Brain Damage

Generalized Public Malice Directed by the US

How US Directs Social Isolation

10. Instigation in social and other settings knowingly using the effects of the clinical condition to cause harm. Eg. Intentional social malice in more vulnerable states of my clinical condition (emotional liability in multiple sclerosis is called pseudobulbar effect).

Pseudobulbar Malice-Malice Using a Neurological Effect

Using other intentionally caused neurological effects to effect me negatively

Its all criminal on the part of the US but the US doesn't feel that they should be held accountable for the criminality until I present the case in a court or legal setting. Due to their unaccountability they still perpetuate this type of malice, which is also a larger part of the reason for asylum.

The reason for asylum is explained here:

The reason for asylum is explained here

Video Explanation of Uncovered Topics